↓ Skip to Main Content

Main Navigation

Home
About
Privacy Policy
Services

Off Canvas Menu

Home
About
Privacy Policy
Services

Month: March 2017

Home › 2017 › March

Large Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions – Potential Bad Faith Exposures

Abby Sher Mar 29, 2017 Tagged with deductible, fronting policy, matching deductible, self-insured retention

As the economy recovers from the Great Recession, the insurance industry is experiencing an increase in …

Large Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions – Potential Bad Faith Exposures Read more →

Webinar: Review of Significant Bad Faith Cases in 2016 (3/23/2017 at 11:30a – 12:30p ET)

Jennifer A. Kennedy-Coggins Mar 21, 2017 Tagged with bad faith, heinous misconduct, Punitive Damages, standards, strict liability

Julia Molander and Jennifer Kennedy-Coggins of the Global Insurance Department present this one-hour Cozen O’Connor webinar which will provide a …

Webinar: Review of Significant Bad Faith Cases in 2016 (3/23/2017 at 11:30a – 12:30p ET) Read more →

Mediation Statements in Federal Courts May or May Not be Privileged and Can Be Waived

Ron Tigner Mar 13, 2017 Tagged with attorney client privilege, mediation, mediation privilege, work product

The Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri declined to recognize a mediation privilege in …

Mediation Statements in Federal Courts May or May Not be Privileged and Can Be Waived Read more →

“Succeeds to the Interests of” Does Not Require Assumption of Obligations: D&O Policy’s Insured v. Insured Exclusion Applies to Claim Assigned to Fidelity Insurer; No Bad Faith

William Craven Mar 2, 2017 Tagged with Assigned, Assignment, bad faith, Coverage, D&O policy, Directors and officers policy, Exclusion, Extra-contractual, insurance, Insured-versus-insured exclusion, Succeeds to the interest of

On February 24, 2017, the Texas Supreme Court reinstated a state trial court ruling that an …

“Succeeds to the Interests of” Does Not Require Assumption of Obligations: D&O Policy’s Insured v. Insured Exclusion Applies to Claim Assigned to Fidelity Insurer; No Bad Faith Read more →

Avoiding Insurance Bad Faith

Cozen O’Connor represents insurance clients in jurisdictions throughout the U.S. against statutory and common law first- and third-party extracontractual claims for actual and consequential damages, penalties, punitive and exemplary damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and coverage payments. Whether bad faith claims are addenda to a broader coverage matter or are central to the complaint, Cozen O’Connor attorneys know how to efficiently respond to extracontractual causes of action. More

Subscribe For Updates

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to confirm your subscription.

nobadfaith

Search

Recent Posts

Georgia’s Bad Faith Funhouse: Recent Developments in Time-Limited Settlement Demand Law in Georgia
Bad Settlement Decisions Can Be Costly: Nevada Recognizes Excess Carrier Bad-Faith Claims
Ohio Supreme Court Restricts Discovery of Insurer Claim Files in Bad-Faith Cases
Form Complaint, Predictable Result: North Carolina Federal Court Dismisses Bad Faith Claims
California Court Revives Bad Faith Claim Based on Alleged Claims-Handling Delay

Archives

Categories

Attorney-Client
Bad Faith
environmental cleanup
homeowners’ common law
Late Notice
Oregon insurance claims handling
Reservation of Rights
Texas Insurance Code
Uncategorized
West Virginia Insurance
Worker's Compensation

Cozen O’Connor Blogs

Copyright © 2026 Avoiding Insurance Bad Faith | Powered by Responsive Theme

Copyright © 2026 Avoiding Insurance Bad Faith | Powered by Responsive Theme