↓ Skip to Main Content

Main Navigation

Home
About
Privacy Policy
Services

Off Canvas Menu

Home
About
Privacy Policy
Services

Tag: Extra-contractual

Home › Posts tagged Extra-contractual

Texas Supreme Court Axes Policyholder’s Attempt to Expand Insurer Tort Liability

Donnie Mike Apodaca, II Jun 28, 2022 Tagged with bad faith, Extra-contractual, good faith and fair dealing, insurance, Texas, tort

Texas Supreme Court Axes Policyholder’s Attempt to Expand Insurer Tort Liability

In Elephant Insurance Co., LLC v. Kenyon, the Supreme Court of Texas reiterated the framework of …

Texas Supreme Court Axes Policyholder’s Attempt to Expand Insurer Tort Liability Read more →

Fifth Circuit Weighs in on Aftermath of Texas Supreme Court’s Decisions Affecting Insurers’ Pre-Appraisal Award Payments and Damages under the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act

Karl A. Schulz Aug 20, 2021 Tagged with 542, appraisal, award, bad faith, Extra-contractual, extracontractual, insurance, penalty, prompt, Texas

Just a few short years ago, there was a bright line rule under Texas law concerning …

Fifth Circuit Weighs in on Aftermath of Texas Supreme Court’s Decisions Affecting Insurers’ Pre-Appraisal Award Payments and Damages under the Texas Prompt Payment of Claims Act Read more →

South Carolina Federal District Court: Insurer May Act in Bad Faith by Considering Extrinsic Evidence to Deny Duty to Defend

William Craven Apr 7, 2017 Tagged with bad faith, Defense, Defense obligation, Duty to Defend, Exclusion, Extra-contractual, Extrinsic evidence, Roofing Limitation Endorsement, South Carolina

On February 6, 2017, the United States District Court, District of South Carolina, found a genuine …

South Carolina Federal District Court: Insurer May Act in Bad Faith by Considering Extrinsic Evidence to Deny Duty to Defend Read more →

“Succeeds to the Interests of” Does Not Require Assumption of Obligations: D&O Policy’s Insured v. Insured Exclusion Applies to Claim Assigned to Fidelity Insurer; No Bad Faith

William Craven Mar 2, 2017 Tagged with Assigned, Assignment, bad faith, Coverage, D&O policy, Directors and officers policy, Exclusion, Extra-contractual, insurance, Insured-versus-insured exclusion, Succeeds to the interest of

On February 24, 2017, the Texas Supreme Court reinstated a state trial court ruling that an …

“Succeeds to the Interests of” Does Not Require Assumption of Obligations: D&O Policy’s Insured v. Insured Exclusion Applies to Claim Assigned to Fidelity Insurer; No Bad Faith Read more →

Avoiding Insurance Bad Faith

Cozen O’Connor represents insurance clients in jurisdictions throughout the U.S. against statutory and common law first- and third-party extracontractual claims for actual and consequential damages, penalties, punitive and exemplary damages, attorneys’ fees and costs, and coverage payments. Whether bad faith claims are addenda to a broader coverage matter or are central to the complaint, Cozen O’Connor attorneys know how to efficiently respond to extracontractual causes of action. More

Subscribe For Updates

Thank you for registering. Please check your email to confirm your subscription.

nobadfaith

Search

Recent Posts

Georgia’s Bad Faith Funhouse: Recent Developments in Time-Limited Settlement Demand Law in Georgia
Bad Settlement Decisions Can Be Costly: Nevada Recognizes Excess Carrier Bad-Faith Claims
Ohio Supreme Court Restricts Discovery of Insurer Claim Files in Bad-Faith Cases
Form Complaint, Predictable Result: North Carolina Federal Court Dismisses Bad Faith Claims
California Court Revives Bad Faith Claim Based on Alleged Claims-Handling Delay

Archives

Categories

Attorney-Client
Bad Faith
environmental cleanup
homeowners’ common law
Late Notice
Oregon insurance claims handling
Reservation of Rights
Texas Insurance Code
Uncategorized
West Virginia Insurance
Worker's Compensation

Cozen O’Connor Blogs

Copyright © 2026 Avoiding Insurance Bad Faith | Powered by Responsive Theme

Copyright © 2026 Avoiding Insurance Bad Faith | Powered by Responsive Theme